<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Choiceless &#38; voiceless? &#187; typology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.choiceless.eu/tag/typology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.choiceless.eu</link>
	<description>A project by D &#38; D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can typologies explain it all?</title>
		<link>http://www.choiceless.eu/2009/typologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choiceless.eu/2009/typologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonvoters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choiceless.eu/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is not one simple, straightforward reason why people do or do not vote. There are many motives&#8212;personal, social, institutional&#8212;for particular patterns of participation. A widespread approach aiming for a better understanding of nonvoters is to categorise them by creating typologies.
Thomas Kleinhenz&#8212;in his book &#8220;Reasons for the decline of turnout&#8221;&#8212;offers one of the most detailed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is not one simple, straightforward reason why people do or do not vote. There are many motives&#8212;personal, social, institutional&#8212;for particular patterns of participation. A widespread approach aiming for a better understanding of nonvoters is to categorise them by creating typologies.</p>
<p>Thomas Kleinhenz&#8212;in his book &#8220;Reasons for the decline of turnout&#8221;&#8212;offers one of the most detailed typologies of nonvoters, taking into account their socio-economic status, political interests, party identifications, values and participation behaviours. </p>
<p><span id="more-282"></span></p>
<div class="full-image"><img src="http://www.choiceless.eu/wp-content/uploads/typology.jpg" title="Seven types of nonvoters, but no young people" alt="Seven types of nonvoters, but no young people" /></div>
<p><small class="tooltip"><em> Seven types of nonvoters, but no young people | Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darwinbell/365380101/">Darwin Bell</a> on Flickr</em></small></p>
<p>Kleinhenz distinguishes seven types of nonvoters, each labelled with a self-explanatory name. While these do not represent homogeneous groups, you may be able to identify one or more of these fictitious characters among your neighbours and acquaintances&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Active post-materialists</li>
<li>Upper-class conservatives</li>
<li>Isolated disadvantaged persons</li>
<li>Passive uninterested persons</li>
<li>Saturated middle-class people</li>
<li>Individualist yuppies</li>
<li>Disappointed workers</li>
</ul>
<p>The decisive motives of these different types of nonvoters for their abstention are related to ineffectiveness, individualism, alienation, disinterest, satisfaction, self-centredness or dissatisfaction &#8211; all of which can&#8212;on their own or in any given combination&#8212;be valid and comprehensible reasons for different participation behaviours.</p>
<blockquote><p>Typologies of nonvoters largely ignore young people.<br /><small class="tooltip" style="text-align:right;"><em>New research is needed.</em></small></p></blockquote>
<p>And yet, like most other typologies, Kleinhenz&#8217; model does not relate strongly enough to young people&#8212;in particular those young people aged 16 to 25&#8212;representing an increasingly large proportion of nonvoters. </p>
<p>His typology&#8212;and, in fairness to Thomas Kleinhenz, all others that currently exist&#8212;does not apply to today’s young generation. </p>
<p><strong>We need new research engaging with the characteristics and motivations of young nonvoters!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choiceless.eu/2009/typologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
